News Update

Saudi Arabia imposes temporary visa ban on 14 countries, including PakistanUK protests against Israel detaining two British lawmakersGovt to set up dedicated startup India desk for budding entrepreneursDelhi Govt takes stern action against steep fee hike by private schoolsUK MP Dan Norris arrested for alleged child sex offencesIndian-American country judge nabbed on money-laundering chargesAustralia pledges 2.3 bn Australian dollar to enable households buy solar batteriesIndia, Lanka sign MoU on defence cooperationCX - Mere interconnection under Income Tax law does not establish a related party transaction under Central Excise law, thereby invalidating department's demand for duty at 110% of production cost: CESTATOwaisi moves SC against Waqf Amendment ActNo TDS to be deducted u/s 194EE on payments u/s 80CCAST - Removal of smart cards for pairing with set-top boxes (STBs) constituted job work under Rule 4(5)(a) of CCR, 2004 and thus, reversal of CENVAT credit is not required: CESTATCBIC issues AGT orders of 229 Jcs / ADCs + 308 ACs / DCs + 177 Pr Commissioners / Commissioners + 12 Pr CCs & CCsST - Activity of serving as intermediary between foreign entities & Indian customers, qualifies as export of services; commissions earned by assessee will not attract Service Tax levy: CESTATKessler Syndrome: Over 1200 objects of space debris banged into earth in 2024CX - Valuation - Specifications meant for guidance purposes per se differ from detailed engineering drawings; only the latter is to be included in assessable value: CESTATTrump grants another 75-day to TikTok to find Chinese buyerEU fears Trump beer tariffs may cost one lakh jobsTrump tosses out National Security Agency DirectorBudget Session of Parliament adjourns sine-die; 16 Bills passedHamas says Israeli offensive in Gaza is fatal for hostagesEuropean Commission votes to freeze existing sustainability rules to compete with China and USParliament passes Protection of Interest in Aircraft Objects Bill, 2025US economy adds 2.28 lakh jobs in March monthI-T - Provisions of section 50C are equally applicable to asset forming block of asset as well: ITATChina retaliates; imposes 34% tariffs on American goods
 
Costly entertainment in GST era

JULY 31, 2017

By Shalini Ranjan, Assistant Manager, Grant Thornton India LLP.

'ENTERTAINMENT', for all practical purposes in today's times, includes various modes of recreation – including, but not limited to; circuses, theatre, celebrity–driven events, sporting extravaganzas (especially money–churners like the IPL and the ISL) etc.

Hence, it is only natural that this vast expansion in what 'entertainment' means to us in today's age of click–button information and broadcasting would also entail significant changes in the treatment of the same from a taxation point of view. Under the erstwhile indirect tax regime,State Governments used to derive the power to levy Entertainment Tax vide List II, Schedule 7 of the Constitution of India. Exhibitions, sports events, amusement parks, theatre etc.were the primary areas that attracted the levy of Entertainment Tax.

Introduction of Entertainment Tax – The backdrop

The practice of levying tax on entertainment and amusement was initiated by the British Government to discourage public gatherings. However, even after independence, when governance changed its hands, a source of revenue was too dear for the Governments to let go of. Thus, levy and collection of Entertainment Tax continued unabated.

The rate of Entertainment Tax varied from 15% to 110%; with the highest rate being levied by the State of Jharkhand. However, the States which levied the said tax did offer major concessions to the screening of movies in respective local languages.

Introduction of GST and the 101st Constitutional Amendment

To make way for uniformity in indirect taxation and to remove various ills plaguing the indirect tax system in India – namely multiple levy of taxes, cascading effect and double taxation; Lists I and II of Schedule 7 of the Constitution of India were amended by way of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016. The said Amendment effectively paved the way for Central levies such as Central Excise Duty, Service Tax etc. as well as State levies such as Value Added Tax, Entertainment Tax, and Luxury Tax to be subsumed under GST.

The said Amendment entailed, inter alia ,the substitution to Entry 62 of List II in the manner specified below:

" 62. Taxes on luxuries, including taxes on entertainments, amusements, betting and gambling ."

Prior to amendment

" 62. Taxes on entertainments and amusements to the extent levied and collected by a Panchayat or a Municipality or a Regional Council or a District Council ."

Post amendment

Entertainment Tax: Post–GST perpetuation?

Subsequent to the introduction of GST, all erstwhile Statutes created for the levy and administration of Entertainment Tax by the respective State Governments were repealed; with the respective State GST Acts as well as Rules taking up the said mantle. Consequently, at present, entry to events like sports, exhibitions, amusement facilities, theme parks etc. attracts GST at the maximum imposable rate of 28%.

With the intention of making good the losses suffered by various States as a result of the introduction of GST, the Government enacted the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017;which deals with the levy of a 'compensatory' cess on various goods and services. Section 5(1)(d) of the GST Compensation to States Act takes into consideration the revenue earned by the States from the taxes on luxuries, including taxes on entertainments, amusements, betting and gambling or any other tax levied by the concerned State under the erstwhile entry 62 of List-II (State List) of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution for determining the Cess which may be imposed by a State.

However, it is important to note a small tweaking carried out in Entry 62 vide the 101 st Amendment to the Constitution. The said tweak ensures that the levy of Entertainment Tax is not completely removed; but rather empowers the local authorities to levy the same. Therefore, Entertainment Tax (if) levied by local authorities, continues to thrive under GST.

For instance, the State of Haryana levied Entertainment Tax via the Punjab Entertainments Duty Act, 1955. The Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, in line with Constitutional Amendment, repealed the Punjab Entertainments Duty Act, 1955 via Section 174, leading to no separate levy of Entertainment Tax by the State under GST.

Nevertheless, exercising the powers conferred under the Constitution of India;the Haryana Cabinet has approved the Haryana Municipal Entertainment Duty Bill, 2017, wherein 'Entertainment Duty' shall be collected by urban municipal bodies. It is important to note that this levy and collection shall be over and above the GST paid on events for entertainment.

It appears that Haryana is not the sole State heading towards levy of Entertainment Duty under GST, but there are others which have and may follow suit.

The action taken by the State of Haryana or by any other State shall be well within four corners of Law since the power to levy Entertainment Tax has been given to local authorities. In a situation wherein States are levying Compensation Cess in lieu of revenue loss due to inclusion of taxes like luxury, entertainment, and entry into GST, a separate levy such as Entertainment Tax is nothing but specially engineered way for the States to levy an additional tax.

If the above is not curtailed, this shall effectively defeat the very objective behind the introduction of GST.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

GST Rollout - One Week After | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout - Are We Ready? - Episode 2 (Concluded)

GST Roll-Out - Are we ready? - Episode 1

GST Rollout | Episode 2 | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Extremely Informative Article

Ma'am
The article is extremely informative and well-written. Entertainment Tax seldom comes to the forefront when we discuss indirect taxation, especially in context of the recently-introduced GST provisions.
Your keen observation has highlighted that the imposition of some taxes may still propagate the dreaded system of 'multiplicity of taxes' even under GST. Let's hope some corrective action is undertaken.

Posted by PwC