News Update

Saudi Arabia imposes temporary visa ban on 14 countries, including PakistanUK protests against Israel detaining two British lawmakersGovt to set up dedicated startup India desk for budding entrepreneursDelhi Govt takes stern action against steep fee hike by private schoolsUK MP Dan Norris arrested for alleged child sex offencesIndian-American country judge nabbed on money-laundering chargesAustralia pledges 2.3 bn Australian dollar to enable households buy solar batteriesIndia, Lanka sign MoU on defence cooperationCX - Mere interconnection under Income Tax law does not establish a related party transaction under Central Excise law, thereby invalidating department's demand for duty at 110% of production cost: CESTATOwaisi moves SC against Waqf Amendment ActNo TDS to be deducted u/s 194EE on payments u/s 80CCAST - Removal of smart cards for pairing with set-top boxes (STBs) constituted job work under Rule 4(5)(a) of CCR, 2004 and thus, reversal of CENVAT credit is not required: CESTATCBIC issues AGT orders of 229 Jcs / ADCs + 308 ACs / DCs + 177 Pr Commissioners / Commissioners + 12 Pr CCs & CCsST - Activity of serving as intermediary between foreign entities & Indian customers, qualifies as export of services; commissions earned by assessee will not attract Service Tax levy: CESTATKessler Syndrome: Over 1200 objects of space debris banged into earth in 2024CX - Valuation - Specifications meant for guidance purposes per se differ from detailed engineering drawings; only the latter is to be included in assessable value: CESTATTrump grants another 75-day to TikTok to find Chinese buyerEU fears Trump beer tariffs may cost one lakh jobsTrump tosses out National Security Agency DirectorBudget Session of Parliament adjourns sine-die; 16 Bills passedHamas says Israeli offensive in Gaza is fatal for hostagesEuropean Commission votes to freeze existing sustainability rules to compete with China and USParliament passes Protection of Interest in Aircraft Objects Bill, 2025US economy adds 2.28 lakh jobs in March monthI-T - Provisions of section 50C are equally applicable to asset forming block of asset as well: ITATChina retaliates; imposes 34% tariffs on American goods

MESSAGE BOARD

   

No Fear of Vigilance - CBEC Tells Adjudicators


Quality audit of adjudication orders

In the indirect tax departments, thousands of orders are passed every year. But, there is no system in place, which performs a quality audit of the orders, irrespective of whether the orders are pro-Revenue or pro-Assessee. The basics to be checked are, (a) recording of facts, whether accurate, especially where great deal of investigative material has been gathered, (b) If some evidence has been gathered but not relied on, reason therefor, (c) how faithfully, the assessee's reply has been captured in the adjudicators own language. These days, assessees are asked to give soft copies of replies (or appeal memorandum), which are modified from 1st person to 3rd person and reproduced in the orders.(d) If there are requests for cross-examination, how such requests have been handled by the adjudicator (e) accuracy in the framing of the issues, (f) discussion of each issue, on facts, on law, examination of case laws relied on for both sides, (g) if the cases are not followed, whether any reasons have been given for distinguishing them, (h) finding, whether based on the discussion, or are perverse, i.e., divergent or contrary to the discussions.

In the first appellate authoritys' orders, it is necessary to examine whether facts have been correctly captured, at least important grounds urged by the appellant have been recorded, conduct of PH, and whether recorded submissions have been considered while entering findings, and whether the discussion and findings are relevant to the case? In this cut and paste age, very often one finds irrelevant topics finding their way into the orders.

There should be a permanent set up of quality audit team headed at least by a Chief Commissioner, which will examine randomly selected orders and report it to the Board and also give feed back to the concerned officer passing the order for future guidance. The adjudicator's or appellate authority's future growth should depend on the quality of work delivered by them, not based on meeting the revenue targets, or taking care of protocols.

Unfortunately, most adjudicators do not write their own orders. Some can't even dictate cogent record of PH. The orders are written by experienced superintendents. I have wondered what will happen to adjudication process, if all these experienced superintendents eventually retire and the new tribe of promoted superintendents take over, who know neither law, nor English.

Gururaj B N 28/05/2015

 

Back