News Update

Saudi Arabia imposes temporary visa ban on 14 countries, including PakistanUK protests against Israel detaining two British lawmakersGovt to set up dedicated startup India desk for budding entrepreneursDelhi Govt takes stern action against steep fee hike by private schoolsUK MP Dan Norris arrested for alleged child sex offencesIndian-American country judge nabbed on money-laundering chargesAustralia pledges 2.3 bn Australian dollar to enable households buy solar batteriesIndia, Lanka sign MoU on defence cooperationCX - Mere interconnection under Income Tax law does not establish a related party transaction under Central Excise law, thereby invalidating department's demand for duty at 110% of production cost: CESTATOwaisi moves SC against Waqf Amendment ActNo TDS to be deducted u/s 194EE on payments u/s 80CCAST - Removal of smart cards for pairing with set-top boxes (STBs) constituted job work under Rule 4(5)(a) of CCR, 2004 and thus, reversal of CENVAT credit is not required: CESTATCBIC issues AGT orders of 229 Jcs / ADCs + 308 ACs / DCs + 177 Pr Commissioners / Commissioners + 12 Pr CCs & CCsST - Activity of serving as intermediary between foreign entities & Indian customers, qualifies as export of services; commissions earned by assessee will not attract Service Tax levy: CESTATKessler Syndrome: Over 1200 objects of space debris banged into earth in 2024CX - Valuation - Specifications meant for guidance purposes per se differ from detailed engineering drawings; only the latter is to be included in assessable value: CESTATTrump grants another 75-day to TikTok to find Chinese buyerEU fears Trump beer tariffs may cost one lakh jobsTrump tosses out National Security Agency DirectorBudget Session of Parliament adjourns sine-die; 16 Bills passedHamas says Israeli offensive in Gaza is fatal for hostagesEuropean Commission votes to freeze existing sustainability rules to compete with China and USParliament passes Protection of Interest in Aircraft Objects Bill, 2025US economy adds 2.28 lakh jobs in March monthI-T - Provisions of section 50C are equally applicable to asset forming block of asset as well: ITATChina retaliates; imposes 34% tariffs on American goods

MESSAGE BOARD

   

Income Tax - Deduction - Excise Duty paid under protest - ITAT allows


ADVANCE AMOUNT PAID UNDER PLA IS NOT A DEDUCTION OTHERWISE ALLOWABLE HENCE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 43B NOT APPLICABLE


The provisions of section 43B provides :
“Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, a deduction otherwise allowable under this Act in respect of—
(a) any sum payable by the assessee by way of tax, duty, cess or fee, by whatever name called, under any law for the time being in force, or
…………..
………………
shall be allowed (irrespective of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred by the assessee according to the method of accounting regularly employed by him) only in computing the income referred to in section 28 of that previous year in which such sum is actually paid by him.”
….” (emphasis supplied)

Under the Central Excise Act, no legal obligation is cast on the assessee to maintain any minimum amount, which should necessarily remain as balance in the credit of PLA. The only requirement of the Act is that excise duty shall be paid before removal of the goods. Further, after introduction of monthly payment system maintenance of PLA is redundant except for the month of March, where duty is to be paid by 31st March. In view of this, advance payment made under PLA cannot be said to be a liability incurred and hence a deduction allowable under the Act. Therefore provisions of section 43B cannot be invoked at all. Such advance payment under PLA is admissible as deduction in the year of adjustment made against liability to pay duty since the said duty is deemed to have been paid in the year of adjustment.
The provisions of section 43B are in the nature of restricting provisions for allowable deduction and not allowing provisions for inadmissible deduction. If the interpretation of the Tribunal in 2015-TIOL-1346-ITAT-DEL is followed, it may enable an assesse to either avoid of defer payment of income tax by making more advance payment under PLA for a particular year, which is not only against principles of matching but also not the intention of legislation.

V. G. IRKAL
Hospet



vasantirkal vasantirkal 28/08/2015

 

Back