News Update

Saudi Arabia imposes temporary visa ban on 14 countries, including PakistanUK protests against Israel detaining two British lawmakersGovt to set up dedicated startup India desk for budding entrepreneursDelhi Govt takes stern action against steep fee hike by private schoolsUK MP Dan Norris arrested for alleged child sex offencesIndian-American country judge nabbed on money-laundering chargesAustralia pledges 2.3 bn Australian dollar to enable households buy solar batteriesIndia, Lanka sign MoU on defence cooperationCX - Mere interconnection under Income Tax law does not establish a related party transaction under Central Excise law, thereby invalidating department's demand for duty at 110% of production cost: CESTATOwaisi moves SC against Waqf Amendment ActNo TDS to be deducted u/s 194EE on payments u/s 80CCAST - Removal of smart cards for pairing with set-top boxes (STBs) constituted job work under Rule 4(5)(a) of CCR, 2004 and thus, reversal of CENVAT credit is not required: CESTATCBIC issues AGT orders of 229 Jcs / ADCs + 308 ACs / DCs + 177 Pr Commissioners / Commissioners + 12 Pr CCs & CCsST - Activity of serving as intermediary between foreign entities & Indian customers, qualifies as export of services; commissions earned by assessee will not attract Service Tax levy: CESTATKessler Syndrome: Over 1200 objects of space debris banged into earth in 2024CX - Valuation - Specifications meant for guidance purposes per se differ from detailed engineering drawings; only the latter is to be included in assessable value: CESTATTrump grants another 75-day to TikTok to find Chinese buyerEU fears Trump beer tariffs may cost one lakh jobsTrump tosses out National Security Agency DirectorBudget Session of Parliament adjourns sine-die; 16 Bills passedHamas says Israeli offensive in Gaza is fatal for hostagesEuropean Commission votes to freeze existing sustainability rules to compete with China and USParliament passes Protection of Interest in Aircraft Objects Bill, 2025US economy adds 2.28 lakh jobs in March monthI-T - Provisions of section 50C are equally applicable to asset forming block of asset as well: ITATChina retaliates; imposes 34% tariffs on American goods

MESSAGE BOARD

   

CBEC Action Plan to Reduce Litigation


CENVAT Credit - Common input services - Manufacture and trading

Trading has been declared as an exempted service w.e.f. 01.04.2011 and it has been prescribed how the value of ‘Trading Service’ is to be calculated.

But the term ‘Trading’ is being interpreted differently by Auditors (from Central Excise as well as from CERA) and in many cases, even removal of ‘input as such’ is considered as ‘Trading’, which is likely to result in much litigation in near future unless the term ‘Trading’ is also suitably defined / clarified. The following are the major views / counter-views regarding considering removal of ‘input as such’ as ‘Trading’

1. Removal of ‘Input as such’ is ‘Trading’ as assessee merely purchases and sales those goods / inputs without any manufacturing process being undertaken on those goods / inputs.

-> Removal of ‘Input as such’ is governed by specific provision of Rule 3(5) of CCR, 2004. Once the assessee pays the amount as required under Rule 3(5) of CCR, 2004, no further demand can be made under Rule 6 of CCR, 2004 by considering the removal of ‘input as such’ as ‘Trading’.

2. Removal of those inputs on which Cenvat credit has not been taken (non duty paid inputs) can be considered as ‘Trading’.

-> There is no need to make distinction between duty paid ‘inputs’ and non duty paid ‘inputs’ to treat the clearance of later as ‘Trading’. ‘Inputs’ remain ‘inputs’, irrespective of their duty paid character.

3. The removal of input as such (whether Cenvat credit taken or not) may be termed as ‘Trading’ depending upon the profit margin earned by the assessee.

-> Value of Trading has been defined as the difference between the sale price and the cost of goods sold or ten per cent of the cost of goods sold, whichever is more. Therefore, there is no scope to consider clearance of input as such as trading solely on the basis of profit margin.

4. The removal of input as such (whether Cenvat credit taken or not) may be termed as ‘Trading’ depending upon the quantum of such inputs used in manufacture and quantum of such inputs removed as such.

-> The CCR, 2004 do not provide any quantitative restriction / ratio for inputs to be used in manufacturing activity and quantity / ratio of inputs that can be cleared as such.

(views are personal)

Rameshchandra Kabra 19/01/2016

 

Back